Featured Image

Reshore to Reduce the Risk of Retaliation from China

Jan 16, 2025

U.S. president-elect Trump has threatened to impose up to 60% tariffs on imports from China. Although the intent is to safeguard U.S. industries, China has been ramping up its protectionism and there is real concern for retaliation. China will undoubtedly respond with retaliatory countermeasures, likely leading to a paradigm shift in global supply chains. We stand at a pivotal moment. 

Would you like to reduce the impact of U.S. tariffs and potential retaliation from China or other industrial policy actions? Time to evaluate reshoring. 

China’s trade retaliation is no laughing matter   A growing trade war with China will likely mean increasing prices for American consumers and higher costs and supply chain disruption for U.S. manufactures. For example, just one day after the U.S. tightened export controls to limit China’s access to advanced semiconductor technology, Beijing retaliated with a critical minerals embargo. China banned exports of many materials essential to U.S. advanced manufacturing and military technology. 

One week later, Beijing opened an antitrust probe into U.S. chip behemoth Nvidia. China launched additional countermeasures limiting sales to the U.S. and EU of key drone components. And the tightening on drone parts is just the beginning of broader export drone restrictions by Beijing expected in 2025. 

China dominates production of many critical minerals and components, and its retaliations would be painful. A statement from China’s Ministry of Commerce said, “China has decided to strengthen export controls on dual-use (civilian and military) items to the United States, including prohibiting the export of dual-use items to US military users or military use, and strictly controlling the export of gallium, germanium, antimony, superhard materials and graphite-related dual-use items to the United States.” 

The risk of retaliation is real. 

Reshore to mitigate retaliation risks  Since the beginning of the trade war, China has targeted U.S. companies with legislation like the “unreliable entry list” and the “anti-foreign sanctions law” Penalties imposed on companies or individuals include restriction of trade, investment and visas, and even sweeping powers to seize assets and block business transactions of actors that China perceives as harming its interests.  

U.S. manufacturers should consider reshoring to mitigate the risks of tariff retaliation. U.S. import tariffs imposed during the 2018-19 U.S.-China trade war resulted in high tariffs on U.S. exports, leading to losses in U.S. export revenue. Tariffs on Chinese imports will raise the cost of domestic production, making it more difficult for U.S. manufactures to compete globally. 

Localizing production and sourcing will not only reduce geopolitical risk but also make supply chains more resilient and sustainable, encourage investment in infrastructure and workforce development, strengthen the U.S. economy and generate well-paying jobs in manufacturing and other industries through the multiplier effect. 

Many multinationals headquartered in the U.S. and in allied countries produce in China to supply the U.S. market. Shipments to the U.S. from these factories could take multiple hits: China export bans, U.S. tariffs and Taiwan related geopolitical risk. The best way to avoid these risks is to supply the U.S. by reshoring or nearshoring. 

Evaluate and identify opportunities   Use the correct metrics to evaluate your sourcing strategy and identify opportunities. Companies can use the Reshoring Initiative’s free online TCO Estimator and our new Geopolitical Risk measure to compare alternative sources. Geopolitical risks are the #1 factor in reshoring and foreign direct investment (FDI) trends. Consider reshoring and nearshoring as safeguards against tariff retaliation and ongoing global conflicts and tensions.  

Preparing for the trade shift   Engage in workforce training for the skilled workers needed for faster reshoring. Creating a talent pipeline is critical to reshoring and is the #1 criterion for U.S. manufacturing site selection. 

Secure domestic raw materials and inputs where possible to ensure a stable supply, and monitor U.S. policy changes that may be beneficial to your strategy. 

Automate where it makes sense. I advise manufacturers to evaluate the ROI of automation systems based on total cost of ownership (TCO). Reshoring is a major key to reducing risks and automation helps to make reshoring not only possible but globally cost-competitive. New automation technologies that overcome labor shortages and offset higher U.S. wages are helping to close the labor-cost gap and reshore more manufacturing to the United States. Use of TCO is key to calculating whether automation will enable reshoring. It is far more feasible to overcome a 5% TCO gap than a 30% free on board (FOB) price gap. 

New business opportunities for small or medium-sized manufacturers (SMMs)  There is a huge potential for new business opportunities for manufacturers to become suppliers to larger companies that are reshoring supply chains. It is time to prepare for those opportunities. Evaluate your own supply chain risks and shore up vulnerabilities. See if it makes sense to invest in new technologies. Promote and capitalize on your agility and response time as compared to offshore suppliers.  

U.S. footprint mitigates tariff risk  BMW CEO Oliver Zipse said in a 2024 Q3 earnings call that its U.S. manufacturing footprint might protect it from “geopolitical shifts and tariff impact" since 65% of the company’s cars sold in the U.S. are made in the U.S. Bath & Body Works CEO Gina Boswell said they have been reshoring to mitigate tariff risks. Boswell said, “One [reason] is minimal exposure. The other reason for onshoring is just flexibility with speed and agility.” 

Are You Thinking About Reshoring?  The Reshoring Initiative provides a broad range of data and tools to help companies decide which products or components to reshore. Are you thinking about reshoring? For help, contact me at 847-867-1144 or harry.moser@reshorenow.org.  

PicturePicture
Author
Harry Moser
Founder & President
Recent advocacy News
Tariffs, like the new Section 232 tariffs, are reshaping how manufacturers plan, invest, and compete – with consequences that extend well beyond the balance sheet. Here are some important takeaways and insights from AMT’s 2025 Q3 Spot Survey.
AMT Vice President – Technology Ryan Kelly and Trade Lawyer and former (USTR) Counsel Patrick Childress discuss how manufacturers can navigate tariffs, stay compliant, and advocate effectively.
As of Sept. 26, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce has opened a Notice of Request for Public Comments on the Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Robotics and Industrial Machinery.
The Commerce Department added 407 product categories of steel and aluminum derivatives to items subject to 50% tariffs. Even if your finished machining center’s normal duty rate is modest, Section 232 will add 50% on the metal content.
With the recent announcement of new Section 232 derivative tariffs in Q3, member sentiment shifted sharply. AMT’s latest spot survey reveals a renewed sense of strain, strategic hesitation, and export headwinds across the manufacturing technology sector. 
Similar News
undefined
Intelligence
By AMT | Oct 24, 2025

Q3 tariff survey results and practical tariff guidance; Dallas goes big on MT; Sharpie's domestic production investment pays off, and more.

6 min
undefined
Advocacy
By Harry Moser | Oct 23, 2025

More than 500 U.S. manufacturers identify the keys to boosting domestic production: building a skilled workforce, applying total cost of ownership principles, managing costs, and preparing for geopolitical risk.

7 min
undefined
Intelligence
By Christopher Chidzik | Oct 21, 2025

Shipments of cutting tools, measured by the Cutting Tool Market Report, totaled $210.6 million in August 2025, decreasing 2.7% from July 2025 and 1.8% from August 2024. Year-to-date shipments totaled $1.66 billion, down 2.7% from the same period in 2024.

4 min